Skip to main content

Read the question and make sure you understand it, because usually most part of the answer is within the question itself

I spent one year to study how to define a problem for a computer in order to optimise the solutions. As far as I am concerned, we (at least I) know very less about artificial intelligent because we are still unable to define a complex problem for a robot/computer. This reminds me a quote from my favourite lecturer who said “read the question and make sure you understand it, because usually most part of the answer is within the question itself”.

Quote from my final year project's report:
“The abstract of the project is "usually the complexity of a problem is because no one can explain it in a simple way". This makes the problem puzzle-like.

After reading many papers and blogs, it could definitely be said that, despite the same problem (timetabling), everyone explained it in different ways, and everyone had different timetable structure. In other words, looking very closely, it could be seen that they are talking about different problem. Therefore, the complexity of this problem in the first place is not mathematical aspect; it is indeed the delineation of the problem.

The resulting project in delineation aspect of the problem was that many researchers and even systems use rule of thumb to solve the problem, which does not guarantee a solution. Just to mention that even in this project many rules of thumb have been used, despite knowing that it is not the appropriate approach. There were no other options. A timetabling problem has many similarities with a map colouring problem, especially in binary constraints, however in a timetabling problem there are many constraints involved such as preference constraints.”

Popular posts from this blog

I solved GCHQ puzzle and this is how I did it

Today, I was reading the BBC news and I stumbled upon this GCHQ puzzle:
Take the digits 1,2,3 up to 9 in numerical order and put either a plus sign or a minus sign or neither between the digits to make a sum that adds up to 100. 

For example, one way of achieving this is: 1 + 2 + 34 - 5 + 67 - 8 + 9 = 100, which uses six plusses and minuses. What is the fewest number of plusses and minuses you need to do this?

I love to challenge myself with these kind of puzzles, so I solved this and here is how:

We have 9 numbers [1 to 9] and also we have three possible separators [+, - and nothing] which to fill the gap between numbers we have 8 combinations of separators, e.g. we have 1+2+3+4+5+6+7-89 which in this case we have six times plus, one minus and one time nothing.
So, I need to find all possibilities of combination which total is: 6561

Then, hook the possible combinations into numbers and check the total, easy enough. Now print the solution.

I have written this algorithm in PHP but easil…

The best way to predict the future is to create it

I am sure everyone knows the comfort of being on autopilot, less decision to make, apparently it's more reliable and with less potential mistakes as someone else tested and worked for them therefore it should be safe. but it is true?

But life is not that simple, although the easy way(for now) is to avoid thinking about it. To me at this points of the time (this may not be true in the future) life is a book which you need to write it so you write as you wish. You can write a sad story and make the main character a victim or write a happy story be a strong characters.

The best way to predict the future is to create it Abraham Lincoln or Peter Drucker or Alan Kay (don't matter who said it)

In summer 2016 I had an interview with a startup so few days before the interview date I was preparing myself for the interview and I came across this quote and made a note of it. When I entered the interview room, obviously I looked around the room and as my surprise I saw this frame hanging o…

Why I don't have social media account?

Just to be clear, I do not have any social media accounts except LinkedIn. No Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc. 
I used to use some of them but I dropped them all before 2013 and now I am clean for over 4 years. I kept LinkedIn because I use for business contact only.
Today, I came cross this video and found quite interesting as I agree with what he says. 

I always said, the social media website/app specially Facebook and Instagram are just a game. It's funny how some users write the fake status which they don't believe it themselves but other believe it and vice versa. 
If you are making money or adding value to your life by using these apps, then use it otherwise don't kid yourself and just get rid of them, simply. I know it's hard in the beginning but trust me, it worth it, you are not alone.